NM_000059.4:c.7691C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7691C>G(p.Thr2564Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T2564P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Fanconi anemia complementation group D1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- medulloblastomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.7691C>G | p.Thr2564Ser | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.7691C>G | p.Thr2564Ser | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.7322C>G | p.Thr2441Ser | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.7691C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 15 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251304 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461556Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727106 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast/ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 31907386 (2020), 31837001 (2020), 30725392 (2019), 30287823 (2018), 27124784 (2016)), and in unaffected control individuals (PMIDs: 32467295 (2020), 33471991 (2021)). This variant has also been described to be located in a region of the BRCA2 gene that is tolerant to missense sequence changes (PMID: 31911673 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00016 (3/18392 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Observed in individuals with breast or ovarian cancer, and in unaffected controls (Park et al., 2016; So et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Dorling et al., 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 7919C>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12228710, 30725392, 29884841, 32467295, 32377563, 33471991, 31837001, 31907386, 32566972, 27124784)
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
The missense variant NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7691C>G (p.Thr2564Ser) has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. There is a small physicochemical difference between threonine and serine, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. The gene BRCA2 has a low rate of benign missense variation as indicated by a high missense variants Z-Score of 1.00. The p.Thr2564Ser missense variant is predicted to be tolerated by both SIFT or PolyPhen2. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 2564 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Thr2564Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs431825355, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 27124784, 31837001, 31907386). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 418684). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
This missense variant replaces threonine with serine at codon 2564 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 27124784, 33471991). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 4/60466 cases and 2/53461 unaffected controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=1.768 (95%CI 0.324 to 9.655); p-value=0.691; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_008617) (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 3/251304 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.T2564S variant (also known as c.7691C>G), located in coding exon 15 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 7691. The threonine at codon 2564 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was identified in two individuals from a cohort of 715 Korean breast cancer patients and classified as likely benign using ACMG's standards for variant classification based population data, computational data, functional data, clinical phenotype and segregation information (Park KS et al. Genet. Med., 2016 12;18:1250-1257). In a case control study, this variant was reported in 4/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 2/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). The alteration has also been described in other individuals diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer (So MK et al. Breast Cancer, 2019 Jul;26:510-519, Kim HK et al. J Hum Genet, 2020 Mar;65:209-220), but also in unaffected controls (Dong H et al. J Med Genet, 2021 08;58:565-569). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at