13-32362539-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM1
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.7822C>Gā(p.Pro2608Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P2608Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.7822C>G | p.Pro2608Ala | missense_variant | 17/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.7822C>G | p.Pro2608Ala | missense_variant | 17/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461606Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727134
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74282
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 24, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 2608 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has demonstrated this variant does not impact homology-directed DNA repair activity (PMID: 35736817) and an RNA study showed no abnormal splicing (PMID: 32123317). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_002563). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 26, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 2608 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has demonstrated this variant does not impact homology-directed DNA repair activity (PMID: 35736817) and an RNA study showed no abnormal splicing (PMID: 32123317). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_002563). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 25, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 06, 2023 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7822C>G (p.Pro2608Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein, helical domain (IPR015252) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251118 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.7822C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (Dorling_2021), but it was also found in women over the age of 70 without any history of cancer (FLOSSIES dataset). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. The variant did not impact splicing (Wai_2020) and the variant's impact on Homology-Directed Repair activity was considered neutral (Richardson_2021). Five ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: four classified the variant as uncertain significance and one as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
BRCA2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 11, 2023 | The BRCA2 c.7822C>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro2608Ala. This variant was classified as neutral based on the results of a homology-directed double-strand DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay (Table S2, Hu et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35736817). RT-PCR studies indicate this variant does not impact splicing (Table S1, Wai et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32123317). This variant has not been reported in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. It has conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain significance in ClinVar (Table S1, Wai et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32123317). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 13, 2018 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 27, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Mar 18, 2023 | Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 33609447) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 252423). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA2-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2608 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Pro2608Ala). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at