13-48459693-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 4P and 10B. PM1PM5BP4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.1966C>T(p.Arg656Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,613,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R656M) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000321.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | NM_000321.3 | c.1966C>T | p.Arg656Trp | missense_variant | 20/27 | ENST00000267163.6 | NP_000312.2 | |
RB1 | NM_001407165.1 | c.1966C>T | p.Arg656Trp | missense_variant | 20/27 | NP_001394094.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | ENST00000267163.6 | c.1966C>T | p.Arg656Trp | missense_variant | 20/27 | 1 | NM_000321.3 | ENSP00000267163 | P1 | |
RB1 | ENST00000650461.1 | c.1966C>T | p.Arg656Trp | missense_variant | 20/27 | ENSP00000497193 | ||||
RB1 | ENST00000643064.1 | c.194+78250C>T | intron_variant | ENSP00000496005 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 152050Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000664 AC: 167AN: 251334Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000662 AC XY: 90AN XY: 135884
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00106 AC: 1546AN: 1461794Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 743AN XY: 727206
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 152050Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000646 AC XY: 48AN XY: 74280
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | RB1: BS1 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 06, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 21, 2019 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29961174, 26919633, 25452114, 25148578, 15884040, 24688104, 16269091, 12541220, 24082139, 24448499, 22703879) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Retinoblastoma Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Nov 06, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine | May 20, 2024 | Case and Pedigree Information: BILATERAL CASES:1, UNILATERAL CASES:0, TOTAL CASES:1, PEDIGREES:1. ACMG Codes Applied:BS1, BP4 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 02, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 20, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 14, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 11, 2022 | Variant summary: RB1 c.1966C>T (p.Arg656Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Retinoblastoma-associated protein, B-box domain (IPR002719) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 251334 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 16 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RB1 causing Retinoblastoma phenotype (4.2e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Although appearing in the literature, to our knowledge, no penetrant association of c.1966C>T in individuals affected with Retinoblastoma and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and a predominant consensus as benign/likely benign (n=5) (VUS, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
RB1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 05, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at