13-48463839-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.2211+4G>T variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Consequence
RB1
NM_000321.3 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_000321.3 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004005
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.214
Genes affected
RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | NM_000321.3 | c.2211+4G>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000267163.6 | NP_000312.2 | |||
RB1 | NM_001407165.1 | c.2211+4G>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001394094.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | ENST00000267163.6 | c.2211+4G>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000321.3 | ENSP00000267163 | P1 | |||
RB1 | ENST00000643064.1 | c.194+82396G>T | intron_variant | ENSP00000496005 | ||||||
RB1 | ENST00000650461.1 | c.2211+4G>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENSP00000497193 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 26
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
26
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinoblastoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 18, 2021 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RB1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change falls in intron 21 of the RB1 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the RB1 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 23, 2022 | The c.2211+4G>T intronic variant results from a G to T substitution 4 nucleotides after coding exon 21 in the RB1 gene. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will not have any significant effect on splicing. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at