13-51946371-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000053.4(ATP7B):c.2973G>A(p.Thr991Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.067 in 1,613,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,202 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.048 ( 242 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.069 ( 3960 hom. )

Consequence

ATP7B
NM_000053.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.41

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATP7B (HGNC:870): (ATPase copper transporting beta) This gene is a member of the P-type cation transport ATPase family and encodes a protein with several membrane-spanning domains, an ATPase consensus sequence, a hinge domain, a phosphorylation site, and at least 2 putative copper-binding sites. This protein is a monomer, and functions as a copper-transporting ATPase which exports copper out of the cells, such as the efflux of hepatic copper into the bile. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms with distinct cellular localizations, have been characterized. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Wilson disease which is characterized by copper accumulation. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2019]

ATP7B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 13-51946371-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-51946371-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 35713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-51946371-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.41 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0765 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATP7B	NM_000053.4 link	c.2973G>A	p.Thr991Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 21	ENST00000242839.10	NP_000044.2	P35670-1B7ZLR4A0A024RDX3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATP7B	ENST00000242839.10 link	c.2973G>A	p.Thr991Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 21	1	NM_000053.4	ENSP00000242839.5		P35670-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0485

AC:

7387

AN:

152198

Hom.:

242

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0135

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0735

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0273

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0714

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000579

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0562

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0382

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0222

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0782

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0430

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0538

AC:

13350

AN:

248362

Hom.:

490

AF XY:

0.0568

AC XY:

7662

AN XY:

134864

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0236

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0724

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000278

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0594

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0402

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0764

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0601

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0689

AC:

100710

AN:

1461086

Hom.:

3960

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0690

AC XY:

50141

AN XY:

726788

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0249

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0694

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000277

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0603

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0426

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0773

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0614

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0485

AC:

7387

AN:

152316

Hom.:

242

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0455

AC XY:

3390

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0134

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0272

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0714

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0563

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0382

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0782

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0425

Alfa

AF:

0.0697

Hom.:

216

Bravo

AF:

0.0452

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0230

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0788

EpiControl

AF:

0.0742

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Wilson disease

Benign:8

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2019

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:7

Jan 28, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

0.34

DANN

Benign

0.78

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over