Menu
GeneBe

13-76991973-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The ENST00000636183.2(CLN5):c.-126G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000966 in 1,584,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000096 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CLN5
ENST00000636183.2 5_prime_UTR

Scores

1
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN5 (HGNC:2076): (CLN5 intracellular trafficking protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013924897).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CLN5ENST00000636183.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-126G>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/41 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000155
AC:
29
AN:
187370
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
104312
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000330
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000758
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000406
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000957
AC:
137
AN:
1432048
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000113
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
710778
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000309
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000269
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74322
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000201
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000869
ExAC
AF:
0.0000949
AC:
11

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 5 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 14, 2020In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 27, 2022This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 8 of the CLN5 protein (p.Gly8Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs762873839, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CLN5-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 205122). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Not Available"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The arginine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 07, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
Cadd
Benign
1.6
Dann
Benign
0.80
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.062
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.92
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.015
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.31
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.00077
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.58
T
MutPred
0.31
Gain of methylation at G8 (P = 0.0122);
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
-1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs762873839; hg19: chr13-77566108; API