Menu
GeneBe

14-101964687-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.-5A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00376 in 1,586,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 129 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0055 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 112 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.63
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 14-101964687-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-101964687-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 312615.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-101964687-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00547 (831/152010) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0364 (187/5140). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0321. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 447 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 831 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.-5A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/78 ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.-5A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/781 NM_001376.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00540
AC:
820
AN:
151896
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0361
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0123
AC:
2543
AN:
206190
Hom.:
56
AF XY:
0.0104
AC XY:
1199
AN XY:
114794
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0483
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000763
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000240
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00636
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00357
AC:
5129
AN:
1434700
Hom.:
112
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00356
AC XY:
2542
AN XY:
713140
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0453
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000970
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00547
AC:
831
AN:
152010
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00601
AC XY:
447
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0364
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00475
Alfa
AF:
0.00147
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00725
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0250
AC:
86
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 07, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 14, 2023- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 21, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.75
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17511858; hg19: chr14-102431024; COSMIC: COSV64135186; COSMIC: COSV64135186; API