14-104714369-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022489.4(INF2):​c.3207A>G​(p.Pro1069Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.286 in 1,595,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67,668 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1069P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 6273 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 61395 hom. )

Consequence

INF2
NM_022489.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.33

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
INF2 (HGNC:23791): (inverted formin 2) This gene represents a member of the formin family of proteins. It is considered a diaphanous formin due to the presence of a diaphanous inhibitory domain located at the N-terminus of the encoded protein. Studies of a similar mouse protein indicate that the protein encoded by this locus may function in polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. Mutations at this locus have been associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
INF2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 14-104714369-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-104714369-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261618.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.33 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.302 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022489.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
INF2
NM_022489.4
MANE Select
c.3207A>Gp.Pro1069Pro
synonymous
Exon 21 of 23NP_071934.3
INF2
NM_001426862.1
c.3207A>Gp.Pro1069Pro
synonymous
Exon 21 of 23NP_001413791.1
INF2
NM_001426863.1
c.3207A>Gp.Pro1069Pro
synonymous
Exon 21 of 23NP_001413792.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
INF2
ENST00000392634.9
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.3207A>Gp.Pro1069Pro
synonymous
Exon 21 of 23ENSP00000376410.4
INF2
ENST00000617571.5
TSL:1
n.*56A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 20 of 22ENSP00000483829.2
INF2
ENST00000617571.5
TSL:1
n.*56A>G
3_prime_UTR
Exon 20 of 22ENSP00000483829.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.282
AC:
42878
AN:
152014
Hom.:
6259
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.304
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.259
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.245
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.336
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0290
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.190
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.250
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.297
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.305
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.278
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.248
AC:
54098
AN:
217994
AF XY:
0.250
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.303
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.193
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.330
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0273
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.257
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.282
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.286
AC:
413061
AN:
1443382
Hom.:
61395
Cov.:
77
AF XY:
0.285
AC XY:
204080
AN XY:
716634
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.312
AC:
10323
AN:
33050
American (AMR)
AF:
0.204
AC:
8508
AN:
41760
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.328
AC:
8468
AN:
25788
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0311
AC:
1202
AN:
38666
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.203
AC:
17032
AN:
83840
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.257
AC:
13138
AN:
51088
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.304
AC:
1743
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.304
AC:
335455
AN:
1103770
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.288
AC:
17192
AN:
59680
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18783
37566
56349
75132
93915
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10924
21848
32772
43696
54620
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.282
AC:
42928
AN:
152132
Hom.:
6273
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.276
AC XY:
20551
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.304
AC:
12638
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.245
AC:
3747
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.336
AC:
1165
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0287
AC:
148
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.191
AC:
920
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.250
AC:
2650
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.286
AC:
84
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.305
AC:
20751
AN:
67944
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.279
AC:
589
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1578
3156
4733
6311
7889
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
444
888
1332
1776
2220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.109
Hom.:
11434

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Dec 22, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Apr 20, 2021
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 34% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 32. Only high quality variants are reported.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 20, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Aug 19, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.32
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
-2.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1128840; hg19: chr14-105180706; COSMIC: COSV53033539; COSMIC: COSV53033539; API