rs1128840
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_022489.4(INF2):c.3207A>C(p.Pro1069Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.564 in 1,595,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 258,329 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1069P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022489.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | NM_022489.4 | c.3207A>C | p.Pro1069Pro | synonymous_variant | 21/23 | ENST00000392634.9 | NP_071934.3 | |
INF2 | NM_001031714.4 | c.3207A>C | p.Pro1069Pro | synonymous_variant | 21/22 | NP_001026884.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | ENST00000392634.9 | c.3207A>C | p.Pro1069Pro | synonymous_variant | 21/23 | 5 | NM_022489.4 | ENSP00000376410.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.594 AC: 90221AN: 152008Hom.: 27272 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.609 AC: 132775AN: 217994Hom.: 41761 AF XY: 0.602 AC XY: 71587AN XY: 118966
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.561 AC: 810008AN: 1443394Hom.: 231039 Cov.: 77 AF XY: 0.561 AC XY: 402382AN XY: 716634
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.593 AC: 90283AN: 152126Hom.: 27290 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.597 AC XY: 44427AN XY: 74360
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 21, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 92% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 86. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 20, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at