rs1128840

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022489.4(INF2):​c.3207A>C​(p.Pro1069Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.564 in 1,595,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 258,329 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1069P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.59 ( 27290 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.56 ( 231039 hom. )

Consequence

INF2
NM_022489.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.33

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
INF2 (HGNC:23791): (inverted formin 2) This gene represents a member of the formin family of proteins. It is considered a diaphanous formin due to the presence of a diaphanous inhibitory domain located at the N-terminus of the encoded protein. Studies of a similar mouse protein indicate that the protein encoded by this locus may function in polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. Mutations at this locus have been associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
INF2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.98).
BP6
Variant 14-104714369-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-104714369-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261617.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.33 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.892 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
INF2NM_022489.4 linkc.3207A>C p.Pro1069Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 23 ENST00000392634.9 NP_071934.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
INF2ENST00000392634.9 linkc.3207A>C p.Pro1069Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 23 5 NM_022489.4 ENSP00000376410.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.594
AC:
90221
AN:
152008
Hom.:
27272
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.644
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.531
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.567
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.914
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.626
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.538
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.611
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.532
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.609
AC:
132775
AN:
217994
AF XY:
0.602
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.645
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.705
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.573
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.921
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.526
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.542
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.588
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.561
AC:
810008
AN:
1443394
Hom.:
231039
Cov.:
77
AF XY:
0.561
AC XY:
402382
AN XY:
716634
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.641
AC:
21203
AN:
33056
American (AMR)
AF:
0.695
AC:
29012
AN:
41754
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.575
AC:
14838
AN:
25794
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.907
AC:
35068
AN:
38648
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.615
AC:
51555
AN:
83814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.530
AC:
27060
AN:
51098
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.589
AC:
3383
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.538
AC:
593477
AN:
1103810
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.577
AC:
34412
AN:
59680
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23417
46835
70252
93670
117087
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
17096
34192
51288
68384
85480
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.593
AC:
90283
AN:
152126
Hom.:
27290
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.597
AC XY:
44427
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.644
AC:
26757
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.654
AC:
10006
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.567
AC:
1969
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.914
AC:
4707
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.624
AC:
3009
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.538
AC:
5696
AN:
10592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.622
AC:
183
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.532
AC:
36159
AN:
67940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.622
AC:
1313
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1890
3781
5671
7562
9452
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
750
1500
2250
3000
3750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.747
Hom.:
11434

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 21, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 18, 2021
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 92% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 86. Only high quality variants are reported. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 20, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Aug 19, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.98
CADD
Benign
0.29
DANN
Benign
0.42
PhyloP100
-2.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1128840; hg19: chr14-105180706; COSMIC: COSV53035048; COSMIC: COSV53035048; API