Menu
GeneBe

14-22773619-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003982.4(SLC7A7):c.1527A>G(p.Lys509=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.878 in 1,613,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 627,464 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.79 ( 49738 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 577726 hom. )

Consequence

SLC7A7
NM_003982.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.309
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC7A7 (HGNC:11065): (solute carrier family 7 member 7) The protein encoded by this gene is the light subunit of a cationic amino acid transporter. This sodium-independent transporter is formed when the light subunit encoded by this gene dimerizes with the heavy subunit transporter protein SLC3A2. This transporter is found in epithelial cell membranes where it transfers cationic and large neutral amino acids from the cell to the extracellular space. Defects in this gene are a cause of lysinuric protein intolerance (LPI). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 14-22773619-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-22773619-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 139197.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-22773619-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.309 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.907 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC7A7NM_003982.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1527A>G p.Lys509= synonymous_variant 10/10 ENST00000674313.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC7A7ENST00000674313.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1527A>G p.Lys509= synonymous_variant 10/10 NM_003982.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.790
AC:
120034
AN:
152008
Hom.:
49708
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.512
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.957
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.891
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.912
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.928
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.885
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.861
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.896
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.897
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.815
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.876
AC:
220346
AN:
251398
Hom.:
97899
AF XY:
0.883
AC XY:
119936
AN XY:
135878
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.509
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.939
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.918
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.934
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.863
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.894
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.878
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.887
AC:
1295830
AN:
1461080
Hom.:
577726
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
0.889
AC XY:
646073
AN XY:
726892
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.492
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.932
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.915
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.918
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.898
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.862
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.879
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.790
AC:
120112
AN:
152128
Hom.:
49738
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.793
AC XY:
58948
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.513
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.892
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.912
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.928
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.886
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.861
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.897
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.817
Alfa
AF:
0.883
Hom.:
142858
Bravo
AF:
0.781
Asia WGS
AF:
0.894
AC:
3108
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.905
EpiControl
AF:
0.904

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 25, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUnidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría GarrahanJan 24, 2024This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 100% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 95. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Lysinuric protein intolerance Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
Cadd
Benign
2.5
Dann
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1061040; hg19: chr14-23242828; COSMIC: COSV53537224; COSMIC: COSV53537224; API