14-23405642-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002471.4(MYH6):​c.330G>A​(p.Ala110Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00564 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0046 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0057 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

MYH6
NM_002471.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH6 (HGNC:7576): (myosin heavy chain 6) Cardiac muscle myosin is a hexamer consisting of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits. This gene encodes the alpha heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. The gene is located approximately 4kb downstream of the gene encoding the beta heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect 3. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 14-23405642-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23405642-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44481.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-23405642-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr14-23405642-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.42 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00464 (706/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00694 (472/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00642. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 343 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 706 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYH6NM_002471.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.330G>A p.Ala110Ala synonymous_variant 4/39 ENST00000405093.9 NP_002462.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH6ENST00000405093.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.330G>A p.Ala110Ala synonymous_variant 4/395 NM_002471.4 ENSP00000386041.3 P13533
MYH6ENST00000557461.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.397G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/145

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00464
AC:
706
AN:
152152
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00399
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00866
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00694
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00388
AC:
975
AN:
251422
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00386
AC XY:
525
AN XY:
135888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00771
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00609
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00574
AC:
8392
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00552
AC XY:
4016
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000986
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00199
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000441
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00728
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00670
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00573
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00464
AC:
706
AN:
152270
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00461
AC XY:
343
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00399
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00866
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00694
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00474
Alfa
AF:
0.00495
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00374
EpiCase
AF:
0.00545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00557

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 22, 2012Ala110Ala in exon 4 of MYH6: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within t he splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.5% (35/7020) of Europ ean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing P roject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs77679218). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 05, 2017Variant summary: The MYH6 c.330G>A (p.Ala110Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change and 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may alter ESE binding. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 1116/277156 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0040266, which is approximately 161 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MYH6 variant (0.000025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as "likely benign/benign." The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 10, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 16, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2024MYH6: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNov 30, 2015- -
MYH6-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 17, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 21, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77679218; hg19: chr14-23874851; API