14-23427868-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.1605A>G (p.Glu535=) variant in the MYH7 gene is 10.63% (1162/10406) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29300372). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA011032/MONDO:0004994/002

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 238 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 216 hom. )

Consequence

MYH7
NM_000257.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.328

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH7 (HGNC:7577): (myosin heavy chain 7) Muscle myosin is a hexameric protein containing 2 heavy chain subunits, 2 alkali light chain subunits, and 2 regulatory light chain subunits. This gene encodes the beta (or slow) heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. It is expressed predominantly in normal human ventricle. It is also expressed in skeletal muscle tissues rich in slow-twitch type I muscle fibers. Changes in the relative abundance of this protein and the alpha (or fast) heavy subunit of cardiac myosin correlate with the contractile velocity of cardiac muscle. Its expression is also altered during thyroid hormone depletion and hemodynamic overloading. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myosin storage myopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and Laing distal myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
MYH7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1S
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • MYH7-related skeletal myopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • myopathy, myosin storage, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • myopathy, myosin storage, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • congenital myopathy 7A, myosin storage, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Ebstein anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hyaline body myopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • left ventricular noncompaction
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • congenital heart disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000257.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYH7
NM_000257.4
MANE Select
c.1605A>Gp.Glu535Glu
synonymous
Exon 16 of 40NP_000248.2
MYH7
NM_001407004.1
c.1605A>Gp.Glu535Glu
synonymous
Exon 15 of 39NP_001393933.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYH7
ENST00000355349.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1605A>Gp.Glu535Glu
synonymous
Exon 16 of 40ENSP00000347507.3
MYH7
ENST00000713768.1
c.1605A>Gp.Glu535Glu
synonymous
Exon 16 of 41ENSP00000519070.1
MYH7
ENST00000713769.1
c.1605A>Gp.Glu535Glu
synonymous
Exon 15 of 39ENSP00000519071.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0306
AC:
4657
AN:
152104
Hom.:
237
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.106
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000779
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0196
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00829
AC:
2084
AN:
251372
AF XY:
0.00622
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.109
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00532
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000642
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00358
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00341
AC:
4987
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
216
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00305
AC XY:
2217
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.109
AC:
3662
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00646
AC:
289
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000881
AC:
76
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00815
AC:
47
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000380
AC:
423
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00808
AC:
488
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.509
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
331
662
992
1323
1654
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
114
228
342
456
570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0307
AC:
4670
AN:
152222
Hom.:
238
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0298
AC XY:
2221
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.106
AC:
4409
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0100
AC:
153
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000779
AC:
53
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0194
AC:
41
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
215
430
645
860
1075
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0219
Hom.:
77
Bravo
AF:
0.0351
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0160
AC:
56
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000889

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Mar 20, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 08, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not a lter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. In additi on, this variant has been identified in 2.9% of the Black population (dbSNP:rs20 69543). In summary, this variant is highly likely to be benign.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:4
Dec 15, 2016
ClinGen Cardiomyopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.1605A>G (p.Glu535=) variant in the MYH7 gene is 10.63% (1162/10406) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29300372).

Nov 09, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 10, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 15, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:4
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 13, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

MYH7-related skeletal myopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Myosin storage myopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jun 25, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
6.9
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
0.33
Mutation Taster
=63/37
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2069543; hg19: chr14-23897077; API