14-53949884-T-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001202.6(BMP4):c.*148A>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 10 hom. )
Consequence
BMP4
NM_001202.6 3_prime_UTR
NM_001202.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.04
Genes affected
BMP4 (HGNC:1071): (bone morphogenetic protein 4) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates heart development and adipogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with orofacial cleft and microphthalmia in human patients. The encoded protein may also be involved in the pathology of multiple cardiovascular diseases and human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BP6
Variant 14-53949884-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-53949884-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 313346.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.14 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | NM_001202.6 | c.*148A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000245451.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | ENST00000245451.9 | c.*148A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_001202.6 | P1 | ||
BMP4 | ENST00000558984.1 | c.*148A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 3/3 | 1 | P1 | |||
BMP4 | ENST00000559087.5 | c.*148A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | P1 | |||
BMP4 | ENST00000417573.5 | c.*148A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00162 AC: 53AN: 32632Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
32632
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.121 AC: 10566AN: 87308Hom.: 10 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.124 AC XY: 5370AN XY: 43366
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
10566
AN:
87308
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
5370
AN XY:
43366
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00162 AC: 53AN: 32640Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 27AN XY: 16170
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
32640
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
16170
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cleft Lip +/- Cleft Palate, Autosomal Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at