rs76335800

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001202.6(BMP4):​c.*148A>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

BMP4
NM_001202.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.04

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMP4 (HGNC:1071): (bone morphogenetic protein 4) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates heart development and adipogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with orofacial cleft and microphthalmia in human patients. The encoded protein may also be involved in the pathology of multiple cardiovascular diseases and human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
BMP4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • renal agenesis, unilateral
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofacial cleft 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BP6
Variant 14-53949884-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-53949884-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 313346.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00162 (53/32640) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00239 (26/10876). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00167. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 27 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BMP4NM_001202.6 linkc.*148A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000245451.9 NP_001193.2 P12644Q53XC5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BMP4ENST00000245451.9 linkc.*148A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_001202.6 ENSP00000245451.4 P12644
BMP4ENST00000558984.1 linkc.*148A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 1 ENSP00000454134.1 P12644
BMP4ENST00000559087.5 linkc.*148A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 ENSP00000453485.1 P12644
BMP4ENST00000417573.5 linkc.*148A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 5 ENSP00000394165.1 P12644

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00162
AC:
53
AN:
32632
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00846
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.121
AC:
10566
AN:
87308
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.124
AC XY:
5370
AN XY:
43366
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0732
AC:
151
AN:
2062
American (AMR)
AF:
0.121
AC:
173
AN:
1434
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.106
AC:
197
AN:
1856
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0681
AC:
102
AN:
1498
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.152
AC:
382
AN:
2506
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.159
AC:
764
AN:
4796
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.108
AC:
31
AN:
286
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.120
AC:
8269
AN:
68646
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.118
AC:
497
AN:
4224
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.277
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1014
2028
3042
4056
5070
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
178
356
534
712
890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00162
AC:
53
AN:
32640
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
16170
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00239
AC:
26
AN:
10876
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
5
AN:
4862
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00146
AC:
1
AN:
684
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2624
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1728
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00846
AC:
8
AN:
946
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
64
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
12
AN:
10168
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00235
AC:
1
AN:
426
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.412
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000389
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cleft Lip +/- Cleft Palate, Autosomal Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.94
CADD
Benign
0.099
DANN
Benign
0.25
PhyloP100
-4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76335800; hg19: chr14-54416602; COSMIC: COSV55414997; COSMIC: COSV55414997; API