14-74585862-TGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGC-TGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGCGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000428.3(LTBP2):c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC(p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000452 in 1,613,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
LTBP2
NM_000428.3 disruptive_inframe_insertion
NM_000428.3 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.65
Genes affected
LTBP2 (HGNC:6715): (latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the family of latent transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta binding proteins (LTBP), which are extracellular matrix proteins with multi-domain structure. This protein is the largest member of the LTBP family possessing unique regions and with most similarity to the fibrillins. It has thus been suggested that it may have multiple functions: as a member of the TGF-beta latent complex, as a structural component of microfibrils, and a role in cell adhesion. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PM4
Nonframeshift variant in NON repetitive region in NM_000428.3.
BP6
Variant 14-74585862-T-TGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGC is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-74585862-T-TGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGC is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 487460.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=1, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00244 (371/152192) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00816 (339/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00744. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 179 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBP2 | ENST00000261978.9 | c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro | disruptive_inframe_insertion | 3/36 | 1 | NM_000428.3 | ENSP00000261978.4 | ||
LTBP2 | ENST00000556690.5 | c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro | disruptive_inframe_insertion | 3/35 | 5 | ENSP00000451477.1 | |||
LTBP2 | ENST00000553939.5 | n.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/36 | 5 | ENSP00000452110.1 | ||||
LTBP2 | ENST00000557425.1 | n.123+26166_123+26183dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | intron_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00244 AC: 371AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
371
AN:
152076
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000502 AC: 125AN: 249146Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000400 AC XY: 54AN XY: 134872
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
249146
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
134872
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000245 AC: 358AN: 1461612Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000216 AC XY: 157AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
358
AN:
1461612
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
727120
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00244 AC: 371AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00241 AC XY: 179AN XY: 74420
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
371
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
74420
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 13, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 12, 2020 | - - |
Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Aug 01, 2017 | LTBP2 NM_000428.2 exon3 p.Pro271_Ala276dup(c.804_821dup): This variant has not been reported in the literature and is not present in large control databases. Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame duplication of 6 amino acids at position 271 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Microspherophakia;C2751316:Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D;C3553785:Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Aug 16, 2017 | LTBP2 NM_000428.2 exon 3 p. Ala276_Gly277insProGlnSerProProAla (c.821_822insGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC): This variant has not been reported in the literature, but is present in 0.7% (180/2400) of African individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rsrs554570575). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame insertion of 6 amino acids at position 276 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain._x000D_ - |
Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D;C3538951:Microspherophakia and/or megalocornea, with ectopia lentis and with or without secondary glaucoma;C3553785:Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | LTBP2:NM_000428:exon3, p. Ala276_Gly277insProGlnSerProProAla (c.821_822insGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC): This variant has not been reported in the literature, but is present in 0.7% (180/2400) of African individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rsrs554570575). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame insertion of 6 amino acids at position 276 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
LTBP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 15, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at