chr14-74585862-T-TGGCGACTGTGGTGCGGGC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000428.3(LTBP2):c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC(p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000452 in 1,613,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. It is difficult to determine the true allele frequency of this variant because it is of type INS_BIG, and the frequency of such variant types in population databases may be underestimated and unreliable. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P274P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000428.3 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glaucoma 3, primary congenital, DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- microspherophakia and/or megalocornea, with ectopia lentis and with or without secondary glaucomaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3Inheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- congenital glaucomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Weill-Marchesani syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- glaucoma secondary to spherophakia/ectopia lentis and megalocorneaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTBP2 | NM_000428.3 | c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 3 of 36 | ENST00000261978.9 | NP_000419.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTBP2 | ENST00000261978.9 | c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 3 of 36 | 1 | NM_000428.3 | ENSP00000261978.4 | ||
| LTBP2 | ENST00000556690.5 | c.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | p.Pro274_Pro275insProAlaProGlnSerPro | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 3 of 35 | 5 | ENSP00000451477.1 | |||
| LTBP2 | ENST00000553939.5 | n.804_821dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 3 of 36 | 5 | ENSP00000452110.1 | ||||
| LTBP2 | ENST00000557425.1 | n.123+26166_123+26183dupGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00244 AC: 371AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000502 AC: 125AN: 249146 AF XY: 0.000400 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000245 AC: 358AN: 1461612Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000216 AC XY: 157AN XY: 727120 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00244 AC: 371AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00241 AC XY: 179AN XY: 74420 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
LTBP2 NM_000428.2 exon3 p.Pro271_Ala276dup(c.804_821dup): This variant has not been reported in the literature and is not present in large control databases. Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame duplication of 6 amino acids at position 271 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
Microspherophakia;C2751316:Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D;C3553785:Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
LTBP2 NM_000428.2 exon 3 p. Ala276_Gly277insProGlnSerProProAla (c.821_822insGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC): This variant has not been reported in the literature, but is present in 0.7% (180/2400) of African individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rsrs554570575). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame insertion of 6 amino acids at position 276 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain._x000D_ -
Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D;C3538951:Microspherophakia and/or megalocornea, with ectopia lentis and with or without secondary glaucoma;C3553785:Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
LTBP2:NM_000428:exon3, p. Ala276_Gly277insProGlnSerProProAla (c.821_822insGCCCGCACCACAGTCGCC): This variant has not been reported in the literature, but is present in 0.7% (180/2400) of African individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rsrs554570575). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unavailable. This variant represents an in-frame insertion of 6 amino acids at position 276 and is not predicted to alter the reading frame. However, the effect of this variant on the protein is unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
LTBP2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at