14-77428371-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001193315.2(VIPAS39):​c.1460C>T​(p.Ser487Leu) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1,613,532 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00075 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

VIPAS39
NM_001193315.2 missense, splice_region

Scores

3
16
Splicing: ADA: 0.06385
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.668
Variant links:
Genes affected
VIPAS39 (HGNC:20347): (VPS33B interacting protein, apical-basolateral polarity regulator, spe-39 homolog) Involved in endosome to lysosome transport and intracellular protein transport. Acts upstream of or within collagen metabolic process and peptidyl-lysine hydroxylation. Located in Golgi apparatus and endosome. Implicated in arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, and cholestasis 2. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010129333).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000749 (114/152254) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00255 (106/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00216. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 49 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
VIPAS39NM_001193315.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1460C>T p.Ser487Leu missense_variant, splice_region_variant 19/20 ENST00000557658.6 NP_001180244.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VIPAS39ENST00000557658.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1460C>T p.Ser487Leu missense_variant, splice_region_variant 19/201 NM_001193315.2 ENSP00000452191 P1Q9H9C1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000743
AC:
113
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00253
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000211
AC:
53
AN:
251004
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000133
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135676
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000650
AC:
95
AN:
1461278
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000454
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
726986
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000720
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000749
AC:
114
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000658
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00255
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000133
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000763
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00204
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000255
AC:
31

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 17, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 14, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 20, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 21, 2023Variant summary: VIPAS39 c.1460C>T (p.Ser487Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 251004 control chromosomes (gnomAD). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1460C>T in individuals affected with Arthrogryposis, Renal Dysfunction, And Cholestasis 2 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=2) and likely benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
VIPAS39-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 19, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.087
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.013
T;.;T;T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.34
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
.;D;.;D;.;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.032
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.14
N;.;N;N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.55
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.58
N;.;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;.;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.51
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0050
B;.;B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.49
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
3.6
Varity_R
0.037
gMVP
0.071

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.064
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.25
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140365206; hg19: chr14-77894714; API