Variant 14-91869861-G-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_006329.4(FBLN5):c.*363C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000591 in 340,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FBLN5
NM_006329.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

FBLN5 (HGNC:3602): (fibulin 5) The protein encoded by this gene is a secreted, extracellular matrix protein containing an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif and calcium-binding EGF-like domains. It promotes adhesion of endothelial cells through interaction of integrins and the RGD motif. It is prominently expressed in developing arteries but less so in adult vessels. However, its expression is reinduced in balloon-injured vessels and atherosclerotic lesions, notably in intimal vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. Therefore, the protein encoded by this gene may play a role in vascular development and remodeling. Defects in this gene are a cause of autosomal dominant cutis laxa, autosomal recessive cutis laxa type I (CL type I), and age-related macular degeneration type 3 (ARMD3). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FBLN5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000538 (82/152306) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00186 (9/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000972. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 38 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBLN5	NM_006329.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.*363C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	11/11	ENST00000342058.9	NP_006320.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBLN5	ENST00000342058.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.*363C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	11/11	1	NM_006329.4	ENSP00000345008	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000519

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000750

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000634

AC:

119

AN:

187756

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000670

AC XY:

AN XY:

101466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000571

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000769

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000977

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000538

AC:

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000510

AC XY:

AN XY:

74470

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000750

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000763

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000552

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Macular degeneration, age-related, 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cutis laxa

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

7.5

DANN

Benign

0.65

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over