15-34791137-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_Strong
The ENST00000290378.6(ACTC1):c.967G>C(p.Ala323Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A323V) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000290378.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTC1 | NM_005159.5 | c.967G>C | p.Ala323Pro | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000290378.6 | NP_005150.1 | |
GJD2-DT | NR_120329.1 | n.299+13706C>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTC1 | ENST00000290378.6 | c.967G>C | p.Ala323Pro | missense_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_005159.5 | ENSP00000290378 | P1 | |
GJD2-DT | ENST00000671663.1 | n.95-19359C>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 11;C2748552:Atrial septal defect 5;C3150681:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1R Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 04, 2022 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 520303). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ACTC1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 323 of the ACTC1 protein (p.Ala323Pro). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 20, 2016 | The p.A323P variant (also known as c.967G>C), located in coding exon 5 of the ACTC1 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 967. The alanine at codon 323 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was not reported in population based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) and 1000 Genomes Project. In the ESP, this variant was not observed in 6499 samples (12998 alleles) with coverage at this position. Based on internal structural analysis, this alteration disrupts the structure near a polymerization interface, and may impair fiber formation (von der Ecken J et al. Nature. 2016;534(7609):724-8). Another alteration affecting this amino acid (p.A323V, c.968C>T) has been previously detected in a patient reported to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who also had a variant in MYBPC3 (Maron BJ. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(1):57-63). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at