15-43600623-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_153700.2(STRC):āc.4904T>Cā(p.Val1635Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000132 in 151,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153700.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | NM_153700.2 | c.4904T>C | p.Val1635Ala | missense_variant | 26/29 | ENST00000450892.7 | NP_714544.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRC | ENST00000450892.7 | c.4904T>C | p.Val1635Ala | missense_variant | 26/29 | 5 | NM_153700.2 | ENSP00000401513 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74190
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 08, 2016 | p.Val1635Ala in exon 26 of STRC: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note 4 mammals (rat, opossum, tasmanian devil, and wallaby) have an alanine (Ala ) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, com putational prediction tools do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the pr otein. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at