rs1370498166
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4904T>C(p.Val1635Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000132 in 151,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1635F) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153700.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRC | NM_153700.2 | c.4904T>C | p.Val1635Ala | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 29 | ENST00000450892.7 | NP_714544.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRC | ENST00000450892.7 | c.4904T>C | p.Val1635Ala | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 29 | 5 | NM_153700.2 | ENSP00000401513.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74190 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
p.Val1635Ala in exon 26 of STRC: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note 4 mammals (rat, opossum, tasmanian devil, and wallaby) have an alanine (Ala ) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, com putational prediction tools do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the pr otein. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at