15-48247390-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000338.3(SLC12A1):āc.1614T>Cā(p.Tyr538Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.242 in 1,611,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62,981 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.37 ( 15113 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.23 ( 47868 hom. )
Consequence
SLC12A1
NM_000338.3 synonymous
NM_000338.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.214
Genes affected
SLC12A1 (HGNC:10910): (solute carrier family 12 member 1) This gene encodes a kidney-specific sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter that is expressed on the luminal membrane of renal epithelial cells of the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop and the macula densa. It plays a key role in concentrating urine and accounts for most of the NaCl resorption. It is sensitive to such diuretics as furosemide and bumetanide. Some Bartter-like syndromes result from defects in this gene. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. Additional splice variants have been described but their biological validity in humans has not been experimentally proven.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 15-48247390-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48247390-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48247390-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.214 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.734 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A1 | NM_000338.3 | c.1614T>C | p.Tyr538Tyr | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | ENST00000380993.8 | NP_000329.2 | |
SLC12A1 | NM_001184832.2 | c.1614T>C | p.Tyr538Tyr | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | NP_001171761.1 | ||
SLC12A1 | NM_001384136.1 | c.1614T>C | p.Tyr538Tyr | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | NP_001371065.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A1 | ENST00000380993.8 | c.1614T>C | p.Tyr538Tyr | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | 5 | NM_000338.3 | ENSP00000370381.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.373 AC: 56695AN: 151942Hom.: 15063 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
56695
AN:
151942
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.289 AC: 72429AN: 250762Hom.: 13734 AF XY: 0.277 AC XY: 37532AN XY: 135502
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
72429
AN:
250762
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
37532
AN XY:
135502
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.229 AC: 333804AN: 1459018Hom.: 47868 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.229 AC XY: 166170AN XY: 725906
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
333804
AN:
1459018
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
166170
AN XY:
725906
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.374 AC: 56808AN: 152060Hom.: 15113 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.371 AC XY: 27573AN XY: 74320
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
56808
AN:
152060
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
27573
AN XY:
74320
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1629
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Tyr538Tyr in exon 13 of SLC12A1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 83.66% (1106/1322 ) of African chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs6493311). - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Bartter disease type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at