chr15-48247390-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000338.3(SLC12A1):​c.1614T>C​(p.Tyr538Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.242 in 1,611,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62,981 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.37 ( 15113 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 47868 hom. )

Consequence

SLC12A1
NM_000338.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.214

Publications

26 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC12A1 (HGNC:10910): (solute carrier family 12 member 1) This gene encodes a kidney-specific sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter that is expressed on the luminal membrane of renal epithelial cells of the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop and the macula densa. It plays a key role in concentrating urine and accounts for most of the NaCl resorption. It is sensitive to such diuretics as furosemide and bumetanide. Some Bartter-like syndromes result from defects in this gene. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. Additional splice variants have been described but their biological validity in humans has not been experimentally proven.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
SLC12A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bartter disease type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • antenatal Bartter syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 15-48247390-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48247390-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.214 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.734 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC12A1NM_000338.3 linkc.1614T>C p.Tyr538Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 ENST00000380993.8 NP_000329.2
SLC12A1NM_001184832.2 linkc.1614T>C p.Tyr538Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 NP_001171761.1
SLC12A1NM_001384136.1 linkc.1614T>C p.Tyr538Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 NP_001371065.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC12A1ENST00000380993.8 linkc.1614T>C p.Tyr538Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 5 NM_000338.3 ENSP00000370381.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.373
AC:
56695
AN:
151942
Hom.:
15063
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.741
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0669
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.233
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.209
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.212
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.195
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.333
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.289
AC:
72429
AN:
250762
AF XY:
0.277
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.748
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.229
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.564
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.219
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.195
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.259
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.229
AC:
333804
AN:
1459018
Hom.:
47868
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.229
AC XY:
166170
AN XY:
725906
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.762
AC:
25436
AN:
33380
American (AMR)
AF:
0.288
AC:
12875
AN:
44642
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.232
AC:
6068
AN:
26106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.608
AC:
24124
AN:
39650
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.295
AC:
25423
AN:
86084
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.224
AC:
11954
AN:
53374
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.264
AC:
1520
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.190
AC:
210512
AN:
1109754
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.264
AC:
15892
AN:
60268
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10694
21389
32083
42778
53472
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7758
15516
23274
31032
38790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.374
AC:
56808
AN:
152060
Hom.:
15113
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.371
AC XY:
27573
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.741
AC:
30741
AN:
41472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.288
AC:
4401
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.233
AC:
810
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.578
AC:
2980
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.329
AC:
1583
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.209
AC:
2208
AN:
10562
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.221
AC:
65
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.195
AC:
13242
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.339
AC:
717
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1382
2765
4147
5530
6912
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
486
972
1458
1944
2430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.258
Hom.:
23722
Bravo
AF:
0.394
Asia WGS
AF:
0.469
AC:
1629
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.202
EpiControl
AF:
0.201

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Jul 26, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Tyr538Tyr in exon 13 of SLC12A1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 83.66% (1106/1322 ) of African chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs6493311).

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 12, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Bartter disease type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.65
DANN
Benign
0.71
PhyloP100
-0.21
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6493311; hg19: chr15-48539587; COSMIC: COSV66795409; API