15-48472581-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 3P and 13B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000138.5(FBN1):c.4306G>A(p.Val1436Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000295 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
FBN1
NM_000138.5 missense
NM_000138.5 missense
Scores
9
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.42
Genes affected
FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
PM1
In a domain EGF-like 24; calcium-binding (size 41) in uniprot entity FBN1_HUMAN there are 14 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (78%) in NM_000138.5
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), FBN1. . Gene score misZ: 5.0644 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 8.1787 (greater than threshold 3.09). The gene has 1311 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 112 curated benign missense variants. GenCC has associacion of the gene with MASS syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, geleophysic dysplasia, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, Acromicric dysplasia, familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome, ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant, Marfan syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant, isolated ectopia lentis, neonatal Marfan syndrome, stiff skin syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01252389).
BP6
Variant 15-48472581-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48472581-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 42356.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=6, Benign=8}. Variant chr15-48472581-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000164 (25/152264) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00497 (24/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00343. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 25 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000171 AC: 26AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000577 AC: 145AN: 251344Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000824 AC XY: 112AN XY: 135846
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
145
AN:
251344
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
135846
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000309 AC: 451AN: 1461856Hom.: 7 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.000452 AC XY: 329AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
451
AN:
1461856
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
329
AN XY:
727228
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
152264
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
86
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 11, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 13, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 19, 2018 | - - |
Marfan syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, University of Ghent | Nov 07, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | FBN1: BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 06, 2019 | - - |
Marfan syndrome;C0265287:Acromicric dysplasia;C1858556:MASS syndrome;C1861456:Stiff skin syndrome;C1869115:Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant;C3280054:Geleophysic dysplasia 2;C3541518:Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant;C4310796:Progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 23, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 21, 2015 | proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory - |
Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at