15-48487333-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 3P and 20B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000138.5(FBN1):​c.3442C>G​(p.Pro1148Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0123 in 1,614,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,844 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1148L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 207 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 1637 hom. )

Consequence

FBN1
NM_000138.5 missense

Scores

5
10

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.29

Publications

47 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
FBN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Marfan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Acromicric dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • stiff skin syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • geleophysic dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • isolated ectopia lentis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • neonatal Marfan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Weill-Marchesani syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
  • Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 10 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 4 benign, 12 uncertain in NM_000138.5
PP2
Missense variant in the FBN1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 1311 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 112 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 5.0644 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 8.1787 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to Marfan syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant, progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome, geleophysic dysplasia, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, stiff skin syndrome, familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, isolated ectopia lentis, ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant, Acromicric dysplasia, neonatal Marfan syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017159283).
BP6
Variant 15-48487333-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48487333-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36065.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.23 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000138.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
FBN1
NM_000138.5
MANE Select
c.3442C>Gp.Pro1148Ala
missense
Exon 28 of 66NP_000129.3
FBN1
NM_001406716.1
c.3442C>Gp.Pro1148Ala
missense
Exon 27 of 65NP_001393645.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
FBN1
ENST00000316623.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.3442C>Gp.Pro1148Ala
missense
Exon 28 of 66ENSP00000325527.5
FBN1
ENST00000559133.6
TSL:1
n.3442C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 28 of 67ENSP00000453958.2
FBN1
ENST00000674301.2
n.3442C>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 28 of 68ENSP00000501333.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0168
AC:
2559
AN:
152218
Hom.:
205
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00856
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.240
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0210
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0316
AC:
7939
AN:
251466
AF XY:
0.0281
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00769
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0722
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.240
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0118
AC:
17271
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
1637
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0116
AC XY:
8426
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00797
AC:
267
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0703
AC:
3144
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000842
AC:
22
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.260
AC:
10329
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0157
AC:
1358
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00358
AC:
191
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00364
AC:
21
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000763
AC:
848
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0181
AC:
1091
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
986
1973
2959
3946
4932
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
234
468
702
936
1170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0169
AC:
2569
AN:
152336
Hom.:
207
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0195
AC XY:
1452
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00856
AC:
356
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
721
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.241
AC:
1245
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0199
AC:
96
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00339
AC:
36
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000999
AC:
68
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0218
AC:
46
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
111
222
334
445
556
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00977
Hom.:
103
Bravo
AF:
0.0214
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00887
AC:
39
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000931
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.0288
AC:
3497
Asia WGS
AF:
0.117
AC:
404
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Aug 13, 2021
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Pro1148Ala variant in FBN1 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 24% (4787/19944) of East Asian chromosomes, including 593 homozygotes, by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1.

Mar 08, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 26, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Marfan syndrome Benign:4
Sep 27, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 11, 2015
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Mar 12, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Mar 19, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 19, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Oct 03, 2018
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 27, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

FNB1 POLYMORPHISM Benign:1
May 01, 1997
OMIM
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Jul 14, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
-0.074
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.62
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
PhyloP100
1.3
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.9
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.47
Sift
Benign
0.30
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.39
T
Vest4
0.10
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.037
T
GERP RS
5.6
Mutation Taster
=42/58
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140598; hg19: chr15-48779530; COSMIC: COSV57317550; API