15-48738304-G-A

Position:

chr15-48738304-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.5078C>T(p.Pro1693Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00144 in 1,613,914 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1693P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 40 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.945

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

CEP152 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004120499).

BP6

Variant 15-48738304-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48738304-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 158270.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000972 (148/152186) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0278 (134/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0239. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 109 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	NM_001194998.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.5078C>T	p.Pro1693Leu	missense_variant	27/27	ENST00000380950.7	NP_001181927.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP152	ENST00000380950.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.5078C>T	p.Pro1693Leu	missense_variant	27/27	1	NM_001194998.2	ENSP00000370337	A2	O94986-4
CEP152	ENST00000399334.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.4910C>T	p.Pro1637Leu	missense_variant	26/26	1		ENSP00000382271	P2	O94986-3
CEP152	ENST00000561245.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.142+3327C>T		intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant		2		ENSP00000453591

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000980

AC:

149

AN:

152068

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0279

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00319

AC:

794

AN:

249196

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00432

AC XY:

584

AN XY:

135212

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000557

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0254

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000465

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000354

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00149

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00149

AC:

2176

AN:

1461728

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00217

AC XY:

1576

AN XY:

727148

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0237

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000243

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00151

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000972

AC:

148

AN:

152186

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00147

AC XY:

109

AN XY:

74396

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0278

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000474

Alfa

AF:

0.000171

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000196

ExAC

AF:

0.00367

AC:

444

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0140

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 05, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Jan 08, 2016	- -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Seckel syndrome 5

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.49

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.90

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.0082

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.78

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.77

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.20

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0041

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

L;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

D;D

REVEL

Benign

0.035

Sift

Benign

0.059

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.23

T;T

Vest4

0.21

MVP

0.28

MPC

0.10

ClinPred

0.0095

GERP RS

2.7

Varity_R

0.046

gMVP

0.027

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over