15-48851226-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_203349.4(SHC4):c.1265G>A(p.Ser422Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000226 in 1,461,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_203349.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_203349.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHC4 | NM_203349.4 | MANE Select | c.1265G>A | p.Ser422Asn | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | NP_976224.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHC4 | ENST00000332408.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1265G>A | p.Ser422Asn | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000329668.4 | Q6S5L8-1 | |
| SHC4 | ENST00000396535.7 | TSL:1 | c.536G>A | p.Ser179Asn | missense | Exon 6 of 9 | ENSP00000379786.3 | Q6S5L8-2 | |
| SHC4 | ENST00000537958.5 | TSL:2 | c.407G>A | p.Ser136Asn | missense | Exon 7 of 10 | ENSP00000443300.1 | F5H5M1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000478 AC: 12AN: 251266 AF XY: 0.0000663 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000226 AC: 33AN: 1461778Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727174 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at