15-65078012-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001101362.3(KBTBD13):c.1197C>T(p.Arg399Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0125 in 1,607,256 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 150 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 13 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 137 hom. )
Consequence
KBTBD13
NM_001101362.3 synonymous
NM_001101362.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.01
Genes affected
KBTBD13 (HGNC:37227): (kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 13) The gene belongs to a family of genes encoding proteins containing a BTB domain and several kelch repeats. The BTB domain functions as a protein-protein interaction module, which includes an ability to self-associate or to interact with non-BTB domain-containing proteins. The kelch motif typically occurs in groups of five to seven repeats, and has been found in proteins with diverse functions. Known functions of these family members include transcription regulation, ion channel tetramerization and gating, protein ubiquitination or degradation, and cytoskeleton regulation. The exact function of this family member has yet to be determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 15-65078012-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-65078012-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129306.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1581/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0137 (934/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.013. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 822 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1581 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBTBD13 | NM_001101362.3 | c.1197C>T | p.Arg399Arg | synonymous_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000432196.5 | NP_001094832.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBTBD13 | ENST00000432196.5 | c.1197C>T | p.Arg399Arg | synonymous_variant | 1/1 | 6 | NM_001101362.3 | ENSP00000388723.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0104 AC: 1580AN: 152198Hom.: 13 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1580
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0106 AC: 2495AN: 235428Hom.: 30 AF XY: 0.0108 AC XY: 1405AN XY: 129948
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2495
AN:
235428
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1405
AN XY:
129948
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0127 AC: 18541AN: 1454940Hom.: 137 Cov.: 83 AF XY: 0.0125 AC XY: 9037AN XY: 724128
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
18541
AN:
1454940
Hom.:
Cov.:
83
AF XY:
AC XY:
9037
AN XY:
724128
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0104 AC: 1581AN: 152316Hom.: 13 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0110 AC XY: 822AN XY: 74466
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1581
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
822
AN XY:
74466
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 15, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 06, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | KBTBD13: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Nemaline myopathy 6 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
Position offset: -6
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at