15-67066140-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_005902.4(SMAD3):​c.-15G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.234 in 1,567,362 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44,612 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.22 ( 3864 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 40748 hom. )

Consequence

SMAD3
NM_005902.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.354

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMAD3 (HGNC:6769): (SMAD family member 3) The SMAD family of proteins are a group of intracellular signal transducer proteins similar to the gene products of the Drosophila gene 'mothers against decapentaplegic' (Mad) and the C. elegans gene Sma. The SMAD3 protein functions in the transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway, and transmits signals from the cell surface to the nucleus, regulating gene activity and cell proliferation. This protein forms a complex with other SMAD proteins and binds DNA, functioning both as a transcription factor and tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene are associated with aneurysms-osteoarthritis syndrome and Loeys-Dietz Syndrome 3. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SMAD3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • aneurysm-osteoarthritis syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 15-67066140-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-67066140-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 139216.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.292 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SMAD3NM_005902.4 linkc.-15G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 9 ENST00000327367.9 NP_005893.1 P84022-1A0A024R5Z3Q9P0T0
SMAD3NM_001407011.1 linkc.-15G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 10 NP_001393940.1
SMAD3NM_001407012.1 linkc.-15G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 NP_001393941.1
SMAD3NM_001407013.1 linkc.-15G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 NP_001393942.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMAD3ENST00000327367.9 linkc.-15G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 9 1 NM_005902.4 ENSP00000332973.4 P84022-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.223
AC:
33775
AN:
151458
Hom.:
3870
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.254
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.156
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.254
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.232
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.307
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.275
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.259
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.240
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.219
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.232
AC:
41473
AN:
178506
AF XY:
0.241
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.263
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.241
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.282
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.237
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.235
AC:
333285
AN:
1415792
Hom.:
40748
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.238
AC XY:
167045
AN XY:
700466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.187
AC:
6047
AN:
32274
American (AMR)
AF:
0.119
AC:
4564
AN:
38432
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.263
AC:
6683
AN:
25382
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.202
AC:
7493
AN:
37156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.314
AC:
25478
AN:
81228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.280
AC:
13766
AN:
49120
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.248
AC:
1029
AN:
4144
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.233
AC:
254272
AN:
1089532
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.238
AC:
13953
AN:
58524
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12949
25897
38846
51794
64743
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8740
17480
26220
34960
43700
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.223
AC:
33763
AN:
151570
Hom.:
3864
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.226
AC XY:
16695
AN XY:
74032
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.192
AC:
7959
AN:
41400
American (AMR)
AF:
0.156
AC:
2377
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.254
AC:
880
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.232
AC:
1182
AN:
5088
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.305
AC:
1469
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.275
AC:
2893
AN:
10510
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.252
AC:
74
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.240
AC:
16235
AN:
67710
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.220
AC:
464
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1328
2656
3984
5312
6640
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
372
744
1116
1488
1860
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.237
Hom.:
860
Bravo
AF:
0.207
Asia WGS
AF:
0.297
AC:
1032
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Apr 04, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

-15G>A in exon 1 of SMAD3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signifi cance because it has been identified in 22.8% (1943/8510) of European American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washing -

Aug 16, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Aneurysm-osteoarthritis syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.96
PhyloP100
0.35
Mutation Taster
=300/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1061427; hg19: chr15-67358478; API