15-68214373-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017882.3(CLN6):c.214G>C(p.Glu72Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00127 in 1,613,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

CLN6
NM_017882.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.88

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN6 (HGNC:2077): (CLN6 transmembrane ER protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

CLN6 links:

ENSG00000260007 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260007 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013344973).

BP6

Variant 15-68214373-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-68214373-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 196481.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-68214373-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr15-68214373-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00162 (247/152338) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0129 (62/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 142 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN6	NM_017882.3 link	c.214G>C	p.Glu72Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 7	ENST00000249806.11	NP_060352.1	Q9NWW5-1A0A024R601
CLN6	NM_001411068.1 link	c.310G>C	p.Glu104Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 7		NP_001397997.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN6	ENST00000249806.11 link	c.214G>C	p.Glu72Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 7	1	NM_017882.3	ENSP00000249806.5		Q9NWW5-1
ENSG00000260007	ENST00000562767.2 link	c.83+15129G>C		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	3		ENSP00000456336.1		H3BRN7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00162

AC:

247

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00405

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0130

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00262

AC:

659

AN:

251428

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00331

AC XY:

450

AN XY:

135902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00406

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0182

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00212

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00123

AC:

1804

AN:

1461398

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00171

AC XY:

1243

AN XY:

727036

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00454

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000344

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0163

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000828

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00167

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00162

AC:

247

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00191

AC XY:

142

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00406

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0129

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000248

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00150

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00341

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00287

AC:

349

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 23, 2016

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CLN6: BS1, BS2 -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Benign:2

Aug 30, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6B (Kufs type)

Benign:1

Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

The heterozygous p.Glu72Gln variant in GLN6 has been identified in at least 1 Indian individual with late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (PMID: 12815591), but has also been identified in >1% of South Asian chromosomes and 4 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal recessive late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Feb 15, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.089

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.11

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.70

D;T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.091

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.048

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.88

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

D;D;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.013

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.39

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

M;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

N;N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.61

Sift

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.059

T;T;D;T

Polyphen

0.0030

B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.33

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.85

ClinPred

0.037

GERP RS

4.4

Varity_R

0.077

gMVP

0.78

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.11

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over