chr15-68214373-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The ENST00000249806.11(CLN6):c.214G>C(p.Glu72Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00127 in 1,613,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E72K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

CLN6
ENST00000249806.11 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.88

Publications

22 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN6 (HGNC:2077): (CLN6 transmembrane ER protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

CLN6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6B (Kufs type)
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen

CLN6 links:

ENSG00000260007 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260007 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013344973).

BP6

Variant 15-68214373-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-68214373-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 196481.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00162 (247/152338) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0129 (62/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 142 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000249806.11. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CLN6	NM_017882.3	MANE Select	c.214G>C	p.Glu72Gln	missense	Exon 3 of 7	NP_060352.1
	CLN6	NM_001411068.1		c.310G>C	p.Glu104Gln	missense	Exon 3 of 7	NP_001397997.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CLN6	ENST00000249806.11	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.214G>C	p.Glu72Gln	missense	Exon 3 of 7	ENSP00000249806.5
CLN6	ENST00000566347.5	TSL:1	c.214G>C	p.Glu72Gln	missense	Exon 3 of 6	ENSP00000457783.1
CLN6	ENST00000638076.1	TSL:1	n.214G>C		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 3 of 7	ENSP00000490373.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00162

AC:

247

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00405

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0130

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00262

AC:

659

AN:

251428

AF XY:

0.00331

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00406

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00212

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00123

AC:

1804

AN:

1461398

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00171

AC XY:

1243

AN XY:

727036

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00454

AC:

152

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000157

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000344

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000756

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0163

AC:

1405

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53396

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00607

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

AN:

1111608

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00167

AC:

101

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

115

230

346

461

576

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

130

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00162

AC:

247

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00191

AC XY:

142

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00406

AC:

169

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0129

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000196

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00150

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00341

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00287

AC:

349

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Benign/Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not specified (5)

not provided (3)

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (2)

Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6B (Kufs type) (1)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.089

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.11

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.70

Eigen

Benign

-0.091

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.048

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.88

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

MetaRNN

Benign

0.013

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.39

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

PhyloP100

3.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

REVEL

Uncertain

0.61

Sift

Benign

0.20

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.059

Polyphen

0.0030

Vest4

0.33

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.85

ClinPred

0.037

GERP RS

4.4

Varity_R

0.077

gMVP

0.78

Mutation Taster

=50/50

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.11

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over