15-89326602-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002693.3(POLG):​c.1712+10G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 1,613,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00056 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00067 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

POLG
NM_002693.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.204
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLG (HGNC:9179): (DNA polymerase gamma, catalytic subunit) Mitochondrial DNA polymerase is heterotrimeric, consisting of a homodimer of accessory subunits plus a catalytic subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is the catalytic subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. The encoded protein contains a polyglutamine tract near its N-terminus that may be polymorphic. Defects in this gene are a cause of progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 (PEOA1), sensory ataxic neuropathy dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis (SANDO), Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome (AHS), and mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE). Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 15-89326602-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89326602-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138777.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89326602-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr15-89326602-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000558 (85/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0141 (73/5164). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0115. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLGNM_002693.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1712+10G>A intron_variant ENST00000268124.11 NP_002684.1
POLGARFNM_001406557.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*984+10G>A intron_variant NP_001393486.1
POLGNM_001126131.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1712+10G>A intron_variant NP_001119603.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLGENST00000268124.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1712+10G>A intron_variant 1 NM_002693.3 ENSP00000268124 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000559
AC:
85
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00145
AC:
362
AN:
250264
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00151
AC XY:
204
AN XY:
135414
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000490
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000573
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000981
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000671
AC:
980
AN:
1460840
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000713
AC XY:
518
AN XY:
726744
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000522
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000438
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000596
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000558
AC:
85
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000618
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000127
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000963
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of MedicineOct 01, 2018The NM_002693.2:c.1712+10G>A (NP_002684.1:p.=) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89326602C>T] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Likely Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. BP6:Reputable source(s) without shared data suggest the variant is benign. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Likely Benign. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 19, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
5.3
DANN
Benign
0.49
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55962804; hg19: chr15-89869833; API