16-1844958-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001163560.3(MEIOB):c.784C>T(p.Pro262Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000176 in 1,459,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001163560.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spermatogenic failure 22Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- male infertility with azoospermia or oligozoospermia due to single gene mutationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001163560.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEIOB | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.784C>T | p.Pro262Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 14 | ENSP00000314484.3 | Q8N635-2 | ||
| MEIOB | TSL:5 | c.784C>T | p.Pro262Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 13 | ENSP00000380504.3 | Q8N635-1 | ||
| MEIOB | TSL:2 | c.163C>T | p.Pro55Ser | missense | Exon 9 of 13 | ENSP00000457416.1 | H3BU10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000204 AC: 31AN: 152038Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000257 AC: 60AN: 233560 AF XY: 0.000222 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000173 AC: 226AN: 1307684Hom.: 0 Cov.: 18 AF XY: 0.000171 AC XY: 112AN XY: 653558 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000204 AC: 31AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at