16-1945588-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_005061.3(RPL3L):c.1078G>A(p.Val360Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,613,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005061.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPL3L | NM_005061.3 | c.1078G>A | p.Val360Met | missense_variant | 9/10 | ENST00000268661.8 | NP_005052.1 | |
RPL3L | XM_011522571.3 | c.1093G>A | p.Val365Met | missense_variant | 9/10 | XP_011520873.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPL3L | ENST00000268661.8 | c.1078G>A | p.Val360Met | missense_variant | 9/10 | 1 | NM_005061.3 | ENSP00000268661 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00114 AC: 173AN: 152092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00144 AC: 361AN: 251084Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00133 AC XY: 180AN XY: 135828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00132 AC: 1926AN: 1461686Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 934AN XY: 727130
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00114 AC: 173AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000981 AC XY: 73AN XY: 74406
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at