16-23630140-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BA1BP1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2014G>C variant in PALB2 is a missense variant predicted to cause a substitution of a glutamic acid by glutamine at amino acid 672 (p.Glu672Gln). This variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.02846 in non-Finnish European population, which is higher than the HBOP VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1, and therefore meets this criterion. This variant is functional in multiple protein assays (PMID:31636395, PMID:31757951, PMID:33964450); however, due to a lack of known positive missense controls with known clinical impact, these assays do not meet the requirements for use by the HBOP VCEP. PALB2, in which the variant was identified, is defined by the HBOP VCEP as a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal dominant hereditary breast and pancreatic cancer and autosomal recessive FANCN based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP VCEP. (BA1, BP1) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA151230/MONDO:0016419/020
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000261584.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.2014G>C | p.Glu672Gln | missense_variant | 5/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.2014G>C | p.Glu672Gln | missense_variant | 5/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0221 AC: 3367AN: 152160Hom.: 63 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0228 AC: 5725AN: 251424Hom.: 100 AF XY: 0.0241 AC XY: 3273AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0277 AC: 40430AN: 1461866Hom.: 652 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0279 AC XY: 20287AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0221 AC: 3362AN: 152278Hom.: 63 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0220 AC XY: 1638AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency in ESP (all): 302/12994=2.3% - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 14, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Nov 06, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 10, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | case-control | Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | Jun 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 28, 2016 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Apr 05, 2023 | The c.2014G>C variant in PALB2 is a missense variant predicted to cause a substitution of a glutamic acid by glutamine at amino acid 672 (p.Glu672Gln). This variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.02846 in non-Finnish European population, which is higher than the HBOP VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1, and therefore meets this criterion. This variant is functional in multiple protein assays (PMID: 31636395, PMID: 31757951, PMID: 33964450); however, due to a lack of known positive missense controls with known clinical impact, these assays do not meet the requirements for use by the HBOP VCEP. PALB2, in which the variant was identified, is defined by the HBOP VCEP as a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal dominant hereditary breast and pancreatic cancer and autosomal recessive FANCN based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP VCEP. (BA1, BP1) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Oct 26, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 01, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 18, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 23, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Aug 07, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitters to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz, Maximiliano Zeballos, Melissa DeRycke. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Glu672Gln variant was identified in 210 of 6690 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.03) from individuals or families with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Bogdanova 2011, Rahman 2007, Teo 2013, Adank 2011, Nguyen-Dumont 2013, Kluska 2017). The variant was also identified in ClinVar (10x benign: Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Vantari Genetics, Color Genomics, Prevention Genetics, Counsyl, GeneDx, Pathway Genomics, PALB2 database; 2x likely benign: MacCallum Cancer Genetics, Illumina; 1x not provided: ITMI), MutDB (Mut Prediction score of 0.135 with link to UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Q86YC2: Variant p.Glu672Gln which classifies this variant as a polymorphism-not reported to be implicated in disease), LOVD 3.0 (21x “does not affect function”; 3x not classified), Zhejiang University Database (5x "pathogenicity unknown"), databases. The variant was not identified in the COSMIC database. The variant was identified in control databases in 6201 of 277202 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.02 including 104 homozygous individuals increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: Ashkenazi Jewish* in 355 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.035), European (Non-Finnish) in 3698 of 126702 chromosomes (freq: 0.029), Other in 174 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.027), South Asian in 809 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.026), European (Finnish) in 510 of 25782 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Latino in 531 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.015). The p.Glu672Gln residue is conserved in in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1835817:Fanconi anemia complementation group N;C3150547:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 26, 2022 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group N Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at