16-3047538-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_022468.5(MMP25):c.223G>C(p.Gly75Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G75S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022468.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022468.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP25 | NM_022468.5 | MANE Select | c.223G>C | p.Gly75Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | NP_071913.1 | Q9NPA2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP25 | ENST00000336577.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.223G>C | p.Gly75Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000337816.4 | Q9NPA2 | |
| MMP25 | ENST00000850602.1 | c.223G>C | p.Gly75Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000520889.1 | Q9NPA2 | ||
| MMP25 | ENST00000928201.1 | c.208G>C | p.Gly70Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000598260.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000400 AC: 1AN: 249874 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1460750Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726708
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at