16-31490211-G-T

Position:

chr16-31490211-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_003041.4(SLC5A2):c.1773G>T(p.Glu591Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,614,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

SLC5A2
NM_003041.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.420

Variant links:

Genes affected

SLC5A2 (HGNC:11037): (solute carrier family 5 member 2) This gene encodes a member of the sodium glucose cotransporter family which are sodium-dependent glucose transport proteins. The encoded protein is the major cotransporter involved in glucose reabsorption in the kidney. Mutations in this gene are associated with renal glucosuria. Two transcript variants, one protein-coding and one not, have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2015]

SLC5A2 links:

RUSF1 (HGNC:25848): (RUS family member 1) This gene encodes a putative transmembrane protein containing a conserved DUF647 domain that may be involved in protein-protein interaction. The encoded protein is related to a plant protein that participates in ultraviolet B light-sensing during root morphogenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

RUSF1 links:

SLC5A2 (HGNC:):

SLC5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010189235).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00145 (221/152356) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00278 (189/68036). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00245. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 101 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SLC5A2	NM_003041.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1773G>T	p.Glu591Asp	missense_variant	13/14	ENST00000330498.4	NP_003032.1	P31639-1
RUSF1	NM_022744.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.*624C>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	13/13	ENST00000327237.7	NP_073581.2	Q96GQ5-1A0A024QZE6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SLC5A2	ENST00000330498.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1773G>T	p.Glu591Asp	missense_variant	13/14	1	NM_003041.4	ENSP00000327943.3		P31639-1
RUSF1	ENST00000327237 linkuse as main transcript	c.*624C>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	13/13	1	NM_022744.4	ENSP00000317579.2		Q96GQ5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00145

AC:

221

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00278

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000955

AC:

240

AN:

251288

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000935

AC XY:

127

AN XY:

135852

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00180

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00122

AC:

1778

AN:

1461838

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00122

AC XY:

889

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000268

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00147

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000927

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00145

AC:

221

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00136

AC XY:

101

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00278

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.00181

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000941

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00130

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00105

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00114

AC:

139

EpiCase

AF:

0.00120

EpiControl

AF:

0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial renal glucosuria

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.082

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

1.4

DANN

Benign

0.90

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

Eigen

Benign

-1.0

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.0

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.17

LIST_S2

Benign

0.59

M_CAP

Benign

0.074

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.62

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.13

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.020

REVEL

Benign

0.14

Sift

Benign

0.43

Sift4G

Benign

0.30

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.24

MutPred

0.21

Loss of loop (P = 0.0603);

MVP

0.71

MPC

0.20

ClinPred

0.015

GERP RS

-0.49

Varity_R

0.025

gMVP

0.38

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over