16-370043-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_006428.5(MRPL28):āc.176G>Cā(p.Arg59Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000397 in 1,613,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006428.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRPL28 | NM_006428.5 | c.176G>C | p.Arg59Pro | missense_variant | 2/6 | ENST00000199706.13 | NP_006419.2 | |
MRPL28 | XM_005255041.3 | c.176G>C | p.Arg59Pro | missense_variant | 2/6 | XP_005255098.1 | ||
MRPL28 | XM_011522351.3 | c.176G>C | p.Arg59Pro | missense_variant | 2/6 | XP_011520653.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRPL28 | ENST00000199706.13 | c.176G>C | p.Arg59Pro | missense_variant | 2/6 | 1 | NM_006428.5 | ENSP00000199706 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000454 AC: 69AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000514 AC: 128AN: 249238Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000540 AC XY: 73AN XY: 135246
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000391 AC: 571AN: 1460924Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000409 AC XY: 297AN XY: 726770
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000460 AC: 70AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Oromandibular-limb hypogenesis spectrum Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, University of Montreal | Aug 12, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at