16-5033832-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_016256.4(NAGPA):c.83C>T(p.Ser28Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00168 in 1,551,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016256.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGPA | NM_016256.4 | c.83C>T | p.Ser28Leu | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000312251.8 | NP_057340.2 | |
NAGPA-AS1 | NR_038913.1 | n.131G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGPA | ENST00000312251.8 | c.83C>T | p.Ser28Leu | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_016256.4 | ENSP00000310998.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00873 AC: 1328AN: 152192Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00201 AC: 311AN: 154422Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00161 AC XY: 132AN XY: 82162
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000917 AC: 1283AN: 1399572Hom.: 21 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000783 AC XY: 541AN XY: 690572
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00874 AC: 1331AN: 152310Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00851 AC XY: 634AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at