16-50699948-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001370466.1(NOD2):​c.453C>G​(p.Ser151Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.37 in 1,604,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115,377 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.35 ( 10039 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.37 ( 105338 hom. )

Consequence

NOD2
NM_001370466.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.355
Variant links:
Genes affected
NOD2 (HGNC:5331): (nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2) This gene is a member of the Nod1/Apaf-1 family and encodes a protein with two caspase recruitment (CARD) domains and six leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). The protein is primarily expressed in the peripheral blood leukocytes. It plays a role in the immune response to intracellular bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) by recognizing the muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derived from them and activating the NFKB protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Crohn disease and Blau syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 16-50699948-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-50699948-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 319429.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-50699948-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.355 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.396 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NOD2NM_001370466.1 linkc.453C>G p.Ser151Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 12 ENST00000647318.2 NP_001357395.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NOD2ENST00000647318.2 linkc.453C>G p.Ser151Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 12 NM_001370466.1 ENSP00000495993.1 Q9HC29-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.353
AC:
53564
AN:
151888
Hom.:
10040
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.293
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.418
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.345
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.537
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0517
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.215
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.434
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.363
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.400
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.357
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.331
AC:
80774
AN:
243838
Hom.:
15100
AF XY:
0.334
AC XY:
44159
AN XY:
132224
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.530
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0592
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.241
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.427
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.399
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.365
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.372
AC:
540163
AN:
1452798
Hom.:
105338
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.369
AC XY:
266990
AN XY:
722980
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.293
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.259
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.538
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0566
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.242
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.429
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.394
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.352
AC:
53566
AN:
152008
Hom.:
10039
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.349
AC XY:
25966
AN XY:
74306
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.292
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.346
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.537
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0516
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.215
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.434
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.400
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.352
Alfa
AF:
0.321
Hom.:
1513
Bravo
AF:
0.342
Asia WGS
AF:
0.141
AC:
491
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.406
EpiControl
AF:
0.405

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 54% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 52. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

Regional enteritis;C5201146:Blau syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inflammatory bowel disease 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Blau syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
5.6
DANN
Benign
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2067085; hg19: chr16-50733859; COSMIC: COSV56050555; COSMIC: COSV56050555; API