16-53641066-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):āc.2925A>Gā(p.Val975=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00632 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0050 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0065 ( 51 hom. )
Consequence
RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous
NM_015272.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.35
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 16-53641066-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53641066-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 95691.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-53641066-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.35 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00502 (764/152318) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00667 (454/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00617. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 373 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1L | NM_015272.5 | c.2925A>G | p.Val975= | synonymous_variant | 19/27 | ENST00000647211.2 | NP_056087.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1L | ENST00000647211.2 | c.2925A>G | p.Val975= | synonymous_variant | 19/27 | NM_015272.5 | ENSP00000493946 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00501 AC: 763AN: 152200Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
763
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00544 AC: 1365AN: 250776Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00539 AC XY: 730AN XY: 135506
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1365
AN:
250776
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
730
AN XY:
135506
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00646 AC: 9443AN: 1461438Hom.: 51 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00636 AC XY: 4627AN XY: 727034
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9443
AN:
1461438
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
4627
AN XY:
727034
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00502 AC: 764AN: 152318Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00501 AC XY: 373AN XY: 74498
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
764
AN:
152318
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
373
AN XY:
74498
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 23, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 20, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 11, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
RPGRIP1L-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Joubert syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | RPGRIP1L: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Nephronophthisis 8 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at