rs144313291

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):ā€‹c.2925A>Gā€‹(p.Val975=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00632 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0050 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0065 ( 51 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 16-53641066-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53641066-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 95691.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr16-53641066-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.35 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00502 (764/152318) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00667 (454/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00617. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 373 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2925A>G p.Val975= synonymous_variant 19/27 ENST00000647211.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2925A>G p.Val975= synonymous_variant 19/27 NM_015272.5 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00501
AC:
763
AN:
152200
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00667
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00544
AC:
1365
AN:
250776
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00539
AC XY:
730
AN XY:
135506
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000550
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0203
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00729
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00425
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00646
AC:
9443
AN:
1461438
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00636
AC XY:
4627
AN XY:
727034
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000538
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00715
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00479
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00502
AC:
764
AN:
152318
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00501
AC XY:
373
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00667
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00560
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00380
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00654
EpiControl
AF:
0.00581

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 23, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 11, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 20, 2013- -
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
RPGRIP1L-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 17, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Joubert syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024RPGRIP1L: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Nephronophthisis 8 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144313291; hg19: chr16-53674978; API