16-68819273-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1566-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.000009310

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.345

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

ENSG00000260798 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260798 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 16-68819273-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68819273-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 239885.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 33 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.1566-7C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 10 of 15	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.1383-7C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 9 of 14		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.18-7C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 10 of 15		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-254-2728C>T	intron_variant	Intron 10 of 14		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.1566-7C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 10 of 15	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000795

AC:

AN:

251470

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135912

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000226

AC:

AN:

1461870

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000248

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000225

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74348

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000487

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Sep 28, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The CDH1 c.1566-7C>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 2/246246 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000081, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CDH1 variant (0.0000283). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratoriesclassified this variant as likely benign without additional information to allow for an independent evaluation. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant is classified as a "Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)," until additional information becomes available. -

Jan 06, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Benign:2

Sep 19, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. -

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 20, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 19, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

2.4

DANN

Benign

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0000093

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0060

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over