16-68829770-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):​c.2412C>T​(p.Pro804Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000787 in 1,613,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000064 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.90
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 16-68829770-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68829770-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 183811.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.9 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000224 (34/152080) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00131 (20/15254). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000868. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 34 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.2412C>T p.Pro804Pro synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkc.2229C>T p.Pro743Pro synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkc.864C>T p.Pro288Pro synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkc.447C>T p.Pro149Pro synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.2412C>T p.Pro804Pro synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000224
AC:
34
AN:
151962
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000266
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000915
AC:
23
AN:
251346
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000810
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
135844
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000636
AC:
93
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000715
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000993
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000224
AC:
34
AN:
152080
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000229
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000115
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000325
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Aug 29, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jul 20, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Dec 23, 2022
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:2
Aug 01, 2022
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BP7 (PMID: 30311375) -

Sep 23, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

CDH1: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 04, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 07, 2018
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.2412C>T; p.Pro804Pro variant (rs202075199), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is classified as benign or likely benign in ClinVar (Variation ID: 183811). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.008% (21/277046 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. This is a synonymous change, the nucleotide is not conserved, and computational algorithms do not predict this variant to impact splicing (Alamut v.2.10). Based on available information, this variant is considered likely benign. -

not specified Benign:2
Aug 04, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 09, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
4.5
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202075199; hg19: chr16-68863673; API