16-74714196-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_024306.5(FA2H):​c.1113G>C​(p.Thr371Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000447 in 1,559,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0021 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00026 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

FA2H
NM_024306.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
FA2H (HGNC:21197): (fatty acid 2-hydroxylase) This gene encodes a protein that catalyzes the synthesis of 2-hydroxysphingolipids, a subset of sphingolipids that contain 2-hydroxy fatty acids. Sphingolipids play roles in many cellular processes and their structural diversity arises from modification of the hydrophobic ceramide moiety, such as by 2-hydroxylation of the N-acyl chain, and the existence of many different head groups. Mutations in this gene have been associated with leukodystrophy dysmyelinating with spastic paraparesis with or without dystonia.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 16-74714196-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-74714196-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 320491.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.71 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00213 (324/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0071 (295/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00643. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 137 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FA2HNM_024306.5 linkc.1113G>C p.Thr371Thr synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000219368.8 NP_077282.3 Q7L5A8-1
FA2HXM_011523319.3 linkc.873G>C p.Thr291Thr synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 7 XP_011521621.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FA2HENST00000219368.8 linkc.1113G>C p.Thr371Thr synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_024306.5 ENSP00000219368.3 Q7L5A8-1
FA2HENST00000562145.1 linkn.834G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 1
FA2HENST00000567683.5 linkn.*392G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 5 2 ENSP00000455126.1 H3BP32
FA2HENST00000567683.5 linkn.*392G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 5 of 5 2 ENSP00000455126.1 H3BP32

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00212
AC:
323
AN:
152158
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00710
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000569
AC:
97
AN:
170614
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000498
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
90310
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00759
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000499
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000870
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000632
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000265
AC:
373
AN:
1407576
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000227
AC XY:
158
AN XY:
695364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00809
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000501
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000480
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000634
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00213
AC:
324
AN:
152276
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00184
AC XY:
137
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00710
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000290
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00254
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jan 24, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

FA2H: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

not specified Uncertain:1
Sep 14, 2016
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Dec 16, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 35 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
0.35
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140017632; hg19: chr16-74748094; API