16-79599188-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005360.5(MAF):c.715G>A(p.Ala239Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000767 in 1,058,356 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAF | NM_005360.5 | c.715G>A | p.Ala239Thr | missense_variant | 1/2 | ENST00000326043.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAF | ENST00000326043.5 | c.715G>A | p.Ala239Thr | missense_variant | 1/2 | 1 | NM_005360.5 | A2 | |
MAF | ENST00000569649.1 | c.715G>A | p.Ala239Thr | missense_variant | 1/2 | 5 | P4 | ||
MAF | ENST00000393350.1 | c.715G>A | p.Ala239Thr | missense_variant | 1/1 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00305 AC: 445AN: 145852Hom.: 16 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0827 AC: 44AN: 532Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.0645 AC XY: 20AN XY: 310
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000402 AC: 367AN: 912466Hom.: 19 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000366 AC XY: 156AN XY: 426558
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00305 AC: 445AN: 145890Hom.: 16 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00346 AC XY: 245AN XY: 70892
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ayme-Gripp syndrome;C1857768:Cataract 21 multiple types Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 30, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at