16-79599731-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 7P and 1B. PM1PM2PM5PP2BP4
The NM_005360.5(MAF):c.172A>T(p.Thr58Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T58A) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ayme-Gripp syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- cataract 21 multiple typesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics
- cataract - microcornea syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cerulean cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pulverulent cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fine-Lubinsky syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF | NM_005360.5 | c.172A>T | p.Thr58Ser | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | ENST00000326043.5 | NP_005351.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF | ENST00000326043.5 | c.172A>T | p.Thr58Ser | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 1 | NM_005360.5 | ENSP00000327048.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 36
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at