16-89923372-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1
The ENST00000315491.12(TUBB3):c.-30G>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000165 in 1,451,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TUBB3
ENST00000315491.12 5_prime_UTR
ENST00000315491.12 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.292
Genes affected
TUBB3 (HGNC:20772): (tubulin beta 3 class III) This gene encodes a class III member of the beta tubulin protein family. Beta tubulins are one of two core protein families (alpha and beta tubulins) that heterodimerize and assemble to form microtubules. This protein is primarily expressed in neurons and may be involved in neurogenesis and axon guidance and maintenance. Mutations in this gene are the cause of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 3. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 16-89923372-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-89923372-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 668581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000462 (7/151434) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000103 (7/67758). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000478. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUBB3 | NM_006086.4 | c.-30G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000315491.12 | NP_006077.2 | ||
TUBB3 | NM_001197181.2 | c.-160+1127G>T | intron_variant | NP_001184110.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUBB3 | ENST00000315491.12 | c.-30G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_006086.4 | ENSP00000320295 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000462 AC: 7AN: 151434Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
151434
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 17AN: 1300146Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000218 AC XY: 14AN XY: 642194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
1300146
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
642194
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000462 AC: 7AN: 151434Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000541 AC XY: 4AN XY: 73942
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
151434
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
73942
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 23, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at