16-9764661-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134407.3(GRIN2A):c.2883C>T(p.Asn961Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

GRIN2A
NM_001134407.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.127

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GRIN2A (HGNC:4585): (glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A) This gene encodes a member of the glutamate-gated ion channel protein family. The encoded protein is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit. NMDA receptors are both ligand-gated and voltage-dependent, and are involved in long-term potentiation, an activity-dependent increase in the efficiency of synaptic transmission thought to underlie certain kinds of memory and learning. These receptors are permeable to calcium ions, and activation results in a calcium influx into post-synaptic cells, which results in the activation of several signaling cascades. Disruption of this gene is associated with focal epilepsy and speech disorder with or without cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

GRIN2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Landau-Kleffner syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
continuous spikes and waves during sleep
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
early-onset epileptic encephalopathy and intellectual disability due to GRIN2A mutation
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
rolandic epilepsy-speech dyspraxia syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P

GRIN2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 16-9764661-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-9764661-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 129194.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.127 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000571 (87/152272) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000912 (62/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000729. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 33 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GRIN2A	NM_001134407.3 link	c.2883C>T	p.Asn961Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000330684.4	NP_001127879.1	Q12879-1Q547U9Q59EW6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GRIN2A	ENST00000330684.4 link	c.2883C>T	p.Asn961Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_001134407.3	ENSP00000332549.3		Q12879-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000572

AC:

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000911

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000517

AC:

130

AN:

251406

AF XY:

0.000500

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000636

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000836

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00105

AC:

1534

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

739

AN XY:

727208

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000239

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000648

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00130

AC:

1442

AN:

1111908

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000596

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

173

260

346

433

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

136

204

272

340

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000571

AC:

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000443

AC XY:

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

41546

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000588

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000912

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00190

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000640

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000623

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00120

EpiControl

AF:

0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Landau-Kleffner syndrome

Benign:4

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 19, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

GRIN2A: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Jun 07, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 20, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Nov 22, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

1.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.72

PhyloP100

-0.13

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over