rs77705198

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134407.3(GRIN2A):c.2883C>T(p.Asn961=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

GRIN2A
NM_001134407.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.127

Variant links:

Genes affected

GRIN2A (HGNC:4585): (glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A) This gene encodes a member of the glutamate-gated ion channel protein family. The encoded protein is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit. NMDA receptors are both ligand-gated and voltage-dependent, and are involved in long-term potentiation, an activity-dependent increase in the efficiency of synaptic transmission thought to underlie certain kinds of memory and learning. These receptors are permeable to calcium ions, and activation results in a calcium influx into post-synaptic cells, which results in the activation of several signaling cascades. Disruption of this gene is associated with focal epilepsy and speech disorder with or without cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

GRIN2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 16-9764661-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-9764661-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 129194.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr16-9764661-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.127 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000571 (87/152272) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000912 (62/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000729. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 33 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 87 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
GRIN2A	NM_001134407.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2883C>T	p.Asn961=	synonymous_variant	13/13	ENST00000330684.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
GRIN2A	ENST00000330684.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2883C>T	p.Asn961=	synonymous_variant	13/13	1	NM_001134407.3	P1	Q12879-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000572

AC:

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000911

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000517

AC:

130

AN:

251406

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000500

AC XY:

AN XY:

135868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000636

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000836

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00105

AC:

1534

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

739

AN XY:

727208

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000239

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000648

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000596

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000571

AC:

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000443

AC XY:

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000588

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000912

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.000640

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000623

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00120

EpiControl

AF:

0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Landau-Kleffner syndrome

Benign:4

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 30, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	Aug 19, 2016	- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Jun 07, 2018	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jul 01, 2024	GRIN2A: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 20, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	-	Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Nov 22, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

1.0

DANN

Benign

0.72

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over